Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Journal of Psychosomatic Research ; Conference: 10th annual scientific conference of the European Association of Psychosomatic Medicine (EAPM). Wroclaw Poland. 169 (no pagination), 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-20235531

ABSTRACT

Aims: This study examined the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mothers or childbearing parents using ongoing, systematic screening of a representative Ontario sample. Method(s): An interrupted time series analysis was conducted on data captured in the Healthy Babies Healthy Children (HBHC) screening tool to determine effects of the pandemic on relationships, support, mental health, and related clinical outcomes at the time of postpartum discharge from hospital. The ability to parent or care for the baby/child and other psychosocial and behavioural outcomes were assessed. Result(s): The co-primary outcomes of inability to parent or care for the baby/child were infrequently observed in both the pre -pandemic (March 9, 2019-March 15, 2020) and initial pandemic periods (March 16, 2020-March 23, 2021) ((parent 209/63,006 (0.33%) to 177/56,117 (0.32%), care 537/62,955 (0.85%) to 324/56,086 (0.58%)). Changes following pandemic onset were not observed for either outcome although a significant (beta = 1.013, 95% CI 1.002-1.025, p = 0.02) increase in slope was observed for inability to parent (with questionable clinical significance). For secondary outcomes, worsening was only seen for complications during labour/delivery. Significant improvements were observed in the likelihood of being unable to identify a support person to assist with care, need of newcomer support, and concerns about money over time. Conclusion(s): Despite more complications during labour/delivery, there were no substantive changes in concerns about ability to parent or care for children. Adverse impacts of the pandemic may have been mitigated by accommodations for remote work and social safety net policies.Copyright © 2023

2.
Journal of Clinical Rheumatology ; 29(4 Supplement 1):S53-S54, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2323627

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of adverse effects (AE) of vaccination against COVID-19 in patients with SLE who visit medical centers in Asuncion, Paraguay. Method(s): The study performed was observational, transverse, descriptive. 152 patients with SLE were included, who received at least one dose of anti-COVID vaccine. A survey was carried out, which allowed the data collection through phone calls or instant messaging. Each investigator had a spreadsheet that related the generated code with the surveyed patient's name. Once the call ended and if the patient agreed to participate in the study, a code was generated. Result(s): 88.5% of the individuals were female, the average age was 33.93 +/- 11,102 years. Of these, 94.3% received their first dose, 86.3% the second dose, 39.7% the third dose, and 2.3% the fourth dose. Of the total vaccinated patients, 39.38% were administered Sputnik-V, 26.02% Pfizer, 16.43% AstraZeneca, 13.35% Moderna, 4.1% Covaxin, and 0.68% Hayat Vax. Of 292 doses administered, 103 AEs were recorded, 79.6% within the first 5 days and the rest within the next 5 days. 44.03% presented the AE after the first dose, 32.11% after the second dose and 23.85% after the third dose. Themean duration of symptoms was 7.49 +/- 9.877 days. The most important side effect was pain at the injection site, followed by fever and fatigue. The worsening of Lupus due to the administration of the anticovid vaccine was demonstrated in 9.93% of the cases. Conclusion(s): Mild effects were registered. It is concluded that vaccination against COVID-19 is safe for individuals with SLE.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL